MIT cancels geophysicist’s lecture after woke ‘Twitter mob’ outrage


A geophysicist has slammed the Massachusetts Institute of Technology for caving to cancel tradition after his upcoming science lecture was axed as a result of outrage from a “Twitter mob” who opposed his views on variety.

Dorian Abbot, an affiliate professor of geophysics on the University of Chicago, wrote in an op-ed on Bari Weiss’ Substack on Tuesday that MIT contacted him final week to say his Carlson Lecture was being canceled to “avoid controversy.”

Abbot accused MIT of “quickly” relenting to a Twitter marketing campaign led by MIT college students and up to date alumni that demanded he be uninvited from the annual public lecture as a result of he’d not too long ago argued that educational evaluations must be primarily based on benefit.

He argued the Twitter mob got here after him following a Newsweek op-ed he wrote in August wherein he and Stanford University professor Ivan Marinovic argued that present variety efforts — often called Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion — at universities violated equal therapy.

Instead, they proposed a framework known as Merit, Fairness, and Equality the place “university applicants are treated as individuals and evaluated through a rigorous and unbiased process based on their merit and qualifications alone.”

MIT issued a statement saying that the specific lecture that Dorian Abbot was invited too was cancelled by the department "At their discretion."
MIT issued a press release saying that the particular lecture that Dorian Abbot was invited to was canceled by the division “at their discretion.”Maddie Meyer/Getty Images

Abbot stated his detractors took to Twitter after he was chosen to present his lecture on local weather and the potential for all times on different planets at MIT, which he described as “a major honor in my field.”

“A small group of ideologues mounted a Twitter campaign to cancel a distinguished science lecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology because they disagreed with some of the political positions the speaker had taken. And they were successful within eight days,” he stated.

Dorian Abbot slammed MIT saying that they “quickly” relented to a Twitter campaign led by MIT students and recent alumni.
Dorian Abbot slammed MIT, saying it “quickly” relented to a Twitter marketing campaign led by MIT college students and up to date alumni.

“The incontrovertible fact that such tales have change into an on a regular basis function of American life ought to do nothing to decrease how surprising they’re, and the way damaging they’re to a free society.

“The fact that MIT, one of the greatest universities in the world, caved in so quickly will only encourage others to deploy this same tactic.”

Abbot stated he was additionally beforehand focused by graduate college students in his personal division after he began advocating final 12 months for “academic freedom and merit-based evaluations.”

An associate professor of geophysics at the University of Chicago was yanked from lecturing at MIT after writing an op-ed arguing about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
An affiliate professor of geophysics on the University of Chicago was yanked from lecturing at MIT after writing an op-ed arguing about Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.
Maddie Meyer/Getty Images

Those college students had tried to get his teachings restricted however had been overruled by University of Chicago president Robert Zimmer, who issued a press release in assist of free speech for college, Abbot stated.

An MIT spokesperson informed The Post in a press release that the lecture, which is hosted by the Department of Earth, Atmospheric and Planetary Sciences, wasn’t being held this 12 months “at the discretion of the department.”

They added that Abbot was invited to current his scientific work on MIT’s campus to college students and college.

“Prof. Abbot embraced this offer, and the department has been working with him on setting a date,” the spokesperson stated.

The division head, Professor Robert van der Hilst, added that the lecture wasn’t only a scientific speak for scientists as a result of it included a public outreach element.

“We felt that with the current distractions we would not be in a position to hold an effective outreach event,” van der Hilst stated in a press release.

“I made this decision at my discretion, after consulting with faculty and students in the department, and knowing that some might mistake it as an affront on academic freedom — a characterization I do not agree with.”