Cox: How Greta can transition from blah blah blah


MILAN, Oct 4 (Reuters Breakingviews) – Greta Thunberg did it once more. At the Youth4Climate occasion in Milan final week, forward of a gathering of world leaders to chart the course of the COP26 local weather summit subsequent month in Scotland, the younger Swedish local weather activist stole the headlines. In a speech that went viral, she mocked each company boss and investor brandishing an ESG PowerPoint, in addition to U.S. President Joe Biden and different sloganeering politicians for his or her lack of motion in combating local weather change.

“Build back better. Blah, blah blah. Green economy. Blah, blah, blah. Net zero by 2050. Blah, blah, blah,” she mentioned, together with her attribute deadpan supply, days earlier than the pre-COP26 summit overseen by Prime Minister Mario Draghi’s authorities acquired underway. “This is all we hear from our so-called leaders. Words that sound great but so far have not led to action. Our hopes and ambitions drown in their empty promises.”

Ouch, once more, from Thunberg. She has a degree. And her phrases rely – even the blah, blah, blahs. The 18-year-old has efficiently transformed thousands and thousands of her cohorts to develop into single-issue activists. And Thunberg’s phrases lent vigour to protests within the usually docile streets of the Lombard capital which required a phalanx of police in riot gear wielding thick polycarbonate plastic shields.

Young’uns have each proper to be pissed off at child boomers for having spent the previous 30-plus years spoiling the environment, driving hot-rods and burning coal to energy televisions, leaving the youngsters with the cleanup. But intergenerational resentment gained’t cease the planet from frying. Thunberg has a rare alternative to make use of her international platform to hurry alongside the power transition by going nuclear. Not metaphorically – truly.

Look no additional than the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s newest report, launched within the mid-August doldrums, which warned that the world’s goals to restrict international warming to 1.5 levels Celsius will fall quick without embracing nuclear power. It’s a rare conclusion that challenges the radical-chic consensus in a lot of the developed world, together with G7 nations like Germany, Japan and Italy, host of final week’s occasion, in opposition to nuclear.

Yet the science is tough to disclaim. As the IPCC factors out, over the previous half century, nukes helped to cut back international emissions of carbon dioxide by about 74 gigatons, or the equal of two years’ price of complete international energy-related emissions. The solely cleaner supply, in carbon phrases anyway, is hydropower. Global demand for power goes to extend, notably as economies that haven’t had entry to it develop, and “time is running out to rapidly transform the global energy system,” the IPCC report argues. While wind and solar energy capability is surging, there’s a compelling argument for a secure zero-carbon different.

Which makes it form of shocking that there appears to be no point out of nukes within the concluding suggestions from final week’s “Youth Driving Ambition” powwow the place Thunberg made her blah blah blah speech. The group’s key messages are worthy, together with significant participation of youthful voices, notably these in rising economies and from marginalised teams.

They are additionally calling for enhanced environmental transparency and accountability of non-state actors, better disclosure in finance flows, an “urgent, holistic, diversified and inclusive energy transition by 2030” and the abolition of the fossil fuels business by 2030. These are all noble strategies. But with out concrete coverage suggestions, in addition they threat turning into, nicely, a bit blah, blah, blah.

Thunberg herself has been comparatively mute on the query regardless of hailing from Sweden, a rustic that derives some 40% of its electrical energy from splitting atoms. Two years in the past, she mentioned she was personally against nuclear energy, calling it “extremely dangerous, expensive and time consuming”. But she additionally nodded to the IPCC’s suggestion that it may very well be a part of the answer to local weather change. “Let’s leave that debate until we start looking at the full picture,” she concluded, successfully punting the matter.

It’s time to renew that debate. While it’s true that the destructive externalities of a nuclear mishap are enormous – suppose Chernobyl or Fukushima – the IPCC notes that the expertise has improved tremendously since these services had been commissioned. “Recent advancements in nuclear fuel design improve the safety and economic performance of existing reactors,” the UN physique wrote in August. Small modular reactors, particularly, embrace “a design and manufacture approach that takes advantage of their small size to integrate transformative safety features”.

This is to not say changing to nukes, and mothballing coal and gasoline fired energy crops, can be straightforward. Even if security ranges have improved, extra analysis is required into what are known as “Generation IV” techniques, together with gas- and lead-cooled quick reactors, and people utilizing molten salt, sodium and what’s known as supercritical-water as coolants. And widespread adoption of nuclear energy raises thorny questions across the potential proliferation of nuclear weapons and waste disposal (cue the jokes about Elon Musk sending spent gasoline rods to Mars).

But that is the place Thunberg and her followers can assist. By issuing a strong, public recognition of the potential for next-generation nuclear expertise to interchange the hydrocarbons which can be nonetheless being burned and sending income to contentious regimes like Russia or Saudi Arabia, Thunberg and her youthful acolytes are ready to take away among the long-held stigmas which can be holding again the clearest choice to decarbonise the planet. That’s a far cry from blah, blah, blah.

Follow @rob1cox on Twitter

Editing by George Hay and Karen Kwok

Reuters Breakingviews is the world’s main supply of agenda-setting monetary perception. As the Reuters model for monetary commentary, we dissect the large enterprise and financial tales as they break around the globe daily. A world staff of about 30 correspondents in New York, London, Hong Kong and different main cities offers knowledgeable evaluation in actual time.

Sign up for a free trial of our full service at and comply with us on Twitter @Breakingviews and at All opinions expressed are these of the authors.

Climate activist Greta Thunberg speaks as she joins students holding a Fridays for Future climate strike while environment ministers meet ahead of Glasgow's COP26 meeting, in Milan, Italy, October 1, 2021.